<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marc Bowden on Journalism and The Wire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveclancy.com/2008/02/12/marc-bowden-on-journalism-and-the-wire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveclancy.com/2008/02/12/marc-bowden-on-journalism-and-the-wire/</link>
	<description>Stephen Clancy's online home including blog, résumé, and portfolio.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://steveclancy.com/2008/02/12/marc-bowden-on-journalism-and-the-wire/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveclancy.com/2008/02/12/marc-bowden-on-journalism-and-the-wire/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Let me clarify a bit. I'm not necessarily endorsing Bowden's opinion's of Simon or his conflict at the Baltimore Sun. I do think it's worthwhile to point out that The Wire is a wonderful and realistic portrait of urban life in Baltimore, but it is not journalism. I think its important to make the distinction because a lot of people have mischaracterized it as that in the media (I doubt Simon himself would disagree with that). 

In fairness though, here is the link to the &lt;a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/essay/david-simon-0308" rel="nofollow"&gt;Esquire profile&lt;/a&gt; for those who are interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me clarify a bit. I&#8217;m not necessarily endorsing Bowden&#8217;s opinion&#8217;s of Simon or his conflict at the Baltimore Sun. I do think it&#8217;s worthwhile to point out that The Wire is a wonderful and realistic portrait of urban life in Baltimore, but it is not journalism. I think its important to make the distinction because a lot of people have mischaracterized it as that in the media (I doubt Simon himself would disagree with that). </p>
<p>In fairness though, here is the link to the <a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/essay/david-simon-0308" rel="nofollow">Esquire profile</a> for those who are interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yet actually...</title>
		<link>http://steveclancy.com/2008/02/12/marc-bowden-on-journalism-and-the-wire/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>yet actually...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveclancy.com/2008/02/12/marc-bowden-on-journalism-and-the-wire/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Yet Bowden did pick his facts.

For instance, he declined to acknowledge that he held more than a passing friendship with the editors he was defending:  One of them recently hired him as a columnist on the Philadelphia paper.  And the fabricating reporter that Simon criticized in Baltimore -- Bowden blurbed his first book.

For the counterpunch, check out the current issue of Esquire, where Simon recounts the misadventure with the fabricator and the editors who defended him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet Bowden did pick his facts.</p>
<p>For instance, he declined to acknowledge that he held more than a passing friendship with the editors he was defending:  One of them recently hired him as a columnist on the Philadelphia paper.  And the fabricating reporter that Simon criticized in Baltimore &#8212; Bowden blurbed his first book.</p>
<p>For the counterpunch, check out the current issue of Esquire, where Simon recounts the misadventure with the fabricator and the editors who defended him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
