<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Steve Clancy &#187; content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveclancy.com/tag/content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveclancy.com</link>
	<description>Web developer and sometimes blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The You in User</title>
		<link>http://steveclancy.com/2006/06/07/the-you-in-user/</link>
		<comments>http://steveclancy.com/2006/06/07/the-you-in-user/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 02:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenclancy.com/wordpress/2006/06/07/the-you-in-user/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A professor once told us, &#8220;Only two industries call their customers users: IT people and drug dealers,&#8221; I had to get that out of the way. The internet has been alive with debate this week about &#8220;user-generated content&#8221; and I &#8230; <a href="http://steveclancy.com/2006/06/07/the-you-in-user/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A professor once told us, &#8220;Only two industries call their customers users: IT people and drug dealers,&#8221; I had to get that out of the way. The internet has been alive with debate this week about &#8220;user-generated content&#8221; and I am happy to report that <a href="http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2005/11/10/i-dont-use-the-internet-so-why-am-i-a-user/" title="I don't just "use" the Internet, so why am I a user?">the name itself has been debated</a>. As a content-creating user (is that what we&#8217;re calling it), I figured I could chime in on this subject.
</p>
<p>Talking about a <a href="http://www.youtube.com" title="YouTube">YouTube</a>-esque video sharing site <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB114964368857673340.html" title="Why Getting the User To Create Web Content Isn't Always Progress">Lee Gomes of the Wall Street Journal writes today</a>, &#8221; The short cinematic pastiche we saw is an example of what has come to be called a &#8220;mash-up,&#8221; and for a big part of the tech world, these sorts of mash-ups are becoming the highest form of cultural production.&#8221; Ouch. Besides the fact that most user-generated content on the web is not a &#8220;mash-up&#8221;, is being derivative that shocking. One only needs to take a look at <a href="http://news.google.com" title="Google News">Google News</a> to see the echo chamber that is the mainstream media. Hip-hop music is an entire art form based around building something new out of old tunes. And Hollywood can&#8217;t seem to get enough of &#8220;mash-ups&#8221;, be they sequels or remakes.
</p>
<p>Most user-generated content, however, I think is &#8220;organic&#8221; content that comes out of people&#8217;s daily lives. SixApart&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.vox.com" title="Vox">Vox </a>service seems to be trying to cultivate people&#8217;s lives into interesting content. <a href="http://www.flickr.com" title="Flickr">Flickr</a>, for example, features lots of great <em>original</em> photography from a large group of users. There are plenty of worthwhile pictures for the public, but the others also are special because they mean something to someone. User-generated content is also helping to grow the &#8220;knowledge&#8221; of the Internet in exciting ways. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org" title="Wikipedia">Wikipedia</a> is a great example, there is a lot of stuff in there you could never find anywhere else.
</p>
<p>I think the <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/05/guardian-column-the-future-of-books/" title="The future of books">debate on books</a> has triggered a lot of this backlash. I do not think books are dead, but I think there are certainly some that could be improved. A hyperlinked (even wiki-fied) textbook would be much more helpful than a printed one. Likewise, print encyclopedias are useful to no one. Still I think there is an audience for printed media. Coffee table books should not be done digitally. And I don&#8217;t think hyperlinking and commenting would do very much to improve literature. And I still think there&#8217;s something nice about a tangible object in your hands. I do think there is plenty of room for change though.
</p>
<p>The Internet has enabled more opportunities for value creation than ever before. People can continue to complain about this or they can accept change and move forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steveclancy.com/2006/06/07/the-you-in-user/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

